Review of
Results of the
evaluation of a School-Based For The Prevention Of Substance use
Among Adolescents
This Program evaluation is a results based evaluation of the study.
The Program named EU-DAP stands for European Drug
Addiction Prevention Trial . The purpose of the study is to
assess the effectiveness of the ongoing program. The study was funded
by the European Commission within the Community Public Health
programme in 2002. This is a school based program that is used to
reduce drug abuse in school aged children. This evaluation relies
solely on statistical results as the evidence of meeting program
goals and objectives.
The premise of this study is that smoking, alcohol and drugs all
share a common addition mechanism. Treating one addition or
substitution of different addicting substances defeats the purpose.
This study treats the age group early adolescents for addictive
practices instead of treating one substance abuse at a time. The
study included data from seven countries, nine regional centres,143
schools and involved a sample that included over 7000 students as
participants. This is a very large experimental study to manage.
This program was evaluated using an Outcome Based Evaluation Method.
The main objective of the study was to break the cycle of addictive
behaviors that are prevalent in the study group. The artifact
produced is 28 pages long and does an adequate job of covering the
material contained in the study. This Method of Program evaluation is
appropriate for this study the end result is the most important goal
in this instance. The researchers acknowledge several issues with the
results Such as the cluster effect when class and social position may
skew the result in homogeneous areas. The process was not what the
program sponsor were interested in. How you get to the end result is
minor although it was a monumental task. This process is as open as
the studies research team can make it. This is a necessity as the
data is being collected from schools and about children.
There are 7 pages of charts and tables. These are necessary to help
understand the results of such a massive study. The tables break
down the results into useable bits of information. The statistics are
impressive but alone do not provide evidence of support or failure of
the premise.
500 words is not enough to adequately review this evaluation this
is a very in-depth study with an overabundance of experimental
evidence. This evaluation does an excellent job of summarizing the
study. The material is clear and well written with a good
understanding of the results and the method used. According to the
summary there is some evidence that the program works with alcohol
and cannabis. The study does not present conclusive evidence of the
original thesis. There is enough evidence from similar studies in
the United States and the preliminary results on this study to
continue with the longer term portion of this study.
This Program Evaluation is available to the public on line at
http://www.eudap.net/pdf/FinalReport2.pdf
References
http://www.eudap.net/pdf/FinalReport2.pdf
retrieved 12/1/2012
Hey Glen. I agree that your report is indeed a look at the outcomes of the study. It seems a bit more like a research study than an actual evaluation of the program but that is often the nature of outcomes or summative evaluations. There do not seem to be any recommendations which are key for the effectiveness for any program evaluation. I am often left asking "What next?" when I am presented with reports such as this one. I would also ask the authors of this report why they did not expand their data collection to include those delivering the program, counsellors and others involved in the process.
ReplyDelete